Dosage Precautions

Organ Function and Automated Dose Checks

Wednesday, September 1, 2010 by Mark Bonfiglio
One challenge in arriving at the therapeutic dosage for a medication is the need to adjust to levels of organ function. Automated dosage checking converts a string of inputs such as amount, unit, frequency, etc. which can be compared to defined ranges which are based on age, weight, and other parameters. In the absence of specific information (such as creatinine clearance) the system generally defaults to a range which corresponds to normal organ function. Although a pediatric dosage calculator or pediatric dosage chart may be used in the original dose estimation, organ function cannot be assumed to be normal. Automated checking prior to dose administration should prompt the user to evaluate these factors. Ideally, pediatric dose calculations are modified by indicators of organ function. Hepatic function, in particular, is difficult to estimate objectively. Synthetic activity, detoxification, and genetic factors are important parameters to evaluate. Dosage precautions which are embedded into EMR applications (dose range checking, dosing advice) facilitate the appropriate adjustment of dose based on these parameters. Periodic review of medicine lists may permit the identification of therapies which were initiated at unadjusted dosages. Medicine interactions may also be reviewed in light of changes in organ function changes to ensure medication safety.

Dosage adjustment based on hepatic assessment

Thursday, August 19, 2010 by Mark Bonfiglio

 

Appropriate dosage precautions are needed with hepatically metabolized drugs. Evaluation of medicine lists with the metabolic fate in mind can help to arrive at the optimized therapeutic dosage. All hepatically metabolized drugs should be dosed with caution, but it may be possible to cautiously use a drug metabolized by simple conjugation (morphine, for example) at a moderately reduced dose, even in severe hepatic impairment. Avoiding drugs with more complex metabolism or potential hepatotoxicity in the patient with hepatic impairment makes sense. But often we must devise ways to treat disorders with the “safer” of two options. For this reason it is important to learn and recognize the subtle differences in metabolism. In terms of dosage adjustment, also remember that if we are concerned about accumulation, the amount of an initial/individual dose may not be altered, but the adjustment may be to give this less often. 

Importance of processes and characteristics of drugs in medication dosing

Thursday, August 12, 2010 by Mark Bonfiglio

As with renal impairment, the threshold at which an adjustment of dosage may be necessary depends not only on the route of elimination, but the mechanisms involved. These dosage precautions are essential. Drug classifications rarely point out differences between members regarding the pathways of metabolism. Hepatic metabolism is complex, but it can generally be broadly grouped into two broad types of reactions/pathways: Phase I and Phase II reactions.

Phase I reactions include reactions which greatly modify the chemical structure of the drug. In a way, these are more difficult reactions to perform. The ability of the liver to carry out these functions can be significantly decreased at moderate levels of functional impairment. Phase II reactions are in many ways “simpler” from a chemical standpoint, and the ability to perform them can be preserved even in significant hepatic damage. For this reason, it is important to know not only whether a drug is metabolized, but also the type of metabolism. In this way a therapeutic dosage may be determined.

 

AHRQ Suggests Clinical Decision Support Customization

Monday, August 2, 2010 by Darik Warnke

One of the concepts we have been trying to shed some more light on is the importance of having drug data and clinical decision support data that can be easily customized to the needs of the end user location.  In last year's Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Annual Meeting there were Guidelines Into Decision support that were presented.  These are also know as the acronym GLIDES.  These guidelines are actually a pretty interesting take on the advancement of Clinical Decision Support.

In order to account for users in various types of settings and locations, as well as different dosage precautions, this report specifically calls out the need for better customization.  This may seem a lofty goal but is, nonetheless, worthwhile.  The need to customize clinical decision support to the end user makes complete sense in the fact that being able to deliver appropriate alerts through an EMR geared toward a certain specialty is critical. For example, pediatric dosage calculations and alerts would really be most appropriate within a pediatric practice and, for this reason, these end users may want to see something different.  In an EMR for an oncology practice it would make sense that an alert specific to a chemo regimen appear.  Just something else to think about when building your drug data.


Hepatic Function Assessment in Drug Dosing

Monday, July 19, 2010 by Mark Bonfiglio

As with renal impairment, all pharmacokinetic processes may be affected by hepatic disease and must be considered in dosage administration. Unfortunately there is not a dosing calculator which can encompass these elements, and individualized assessment is needed. The primary process affected by hepatic impairment is the metabolism of drugs. This can affect bioavailability (increases) and systemic clearance/removal of drug (decreases) from the circulation. Both of these effects lead to increased concentrations in the body. As with renal impairment, the potential accumulation of drugs and an increase in adverse effects/toxicity which may occur is the primary concern. Specific dosage precautions must be considered.

 

It is important to evaluate the degree of liver impairment. Just like in renal impairment, liver impairment is not an “all-or-none” phenomenon, and must be evaluated in relative terms. Unlike renal impairment, there is no quick way to estimate hepatic function. Sometimes that is better, since it requires a more thoughtful and complete analysis. Liver function CAN be evaluated by looking at what the liver does from a physiologic standpoint.

 

Elevation of hepatic transaminases (AST and ALT) is not a very reliable indicator of function. These enzymes are released from hepatic cells and serve as an indication of acute injury. But the liver has a large redundancy and damage which occurs over long period of time can lead to serious impairment even in the absence of transaminase elevations.

 

The liver is responsible for synthesis of proteins, including albumin and clotting factors. Elevated prothrombin/INR and/or low serum albumin concentrations indicate that the synthetic capacity of the liver is diminished. The liver is also responsible for excretory functions through the conjugation of bilirubin. Elevations in bilirubin may indicate impairment of this function. There are also other indicators of hepatic function, such as serum ammonia. There is a classification scheme (the Pugh-Child scale) which takes several of these factors into account and may be used to classify the degree of liver impairment into mild, moderate, and severe levels. Specific dosage adjustment and/or contraindications have been published using these criteria for some drugs.

 
It is important to note that medicine interactions are not obvious in evaluating hepatic impairment. Interactions which block a metabolic pathway may be considered as a type of transient, functional hepatic impairment.


EMR, EHR and other systems look earlier to drug database suppliers

Friday, July 9, 2010 by David Wilkof
There is a mad dash going on right now by EMR and other practice management vendors trying to get certified for the "Meaningful Use" and ePrescribing marketplace through organizations such as Surescript and CCHIT.  It is very chaotic and firms are just not sure what they need to do and how long it will take.  In the areas of drug interaction databases,  medication databases,  medicine lists etc,  it is often wise to find firms that are certified with drug data providers already included such as DoseSpot and Amazing Charts.  It might make your life easier and you'll feel more under control.  Under current circumstances it is better not to reinvent the wheel.

There are a very limited number of drug information suppliers or drug data vendors,  possibly only four.  Two of these are Cerner/Multum and Lexi-Comp.  If you need to select such a vendor or manage your dosage precautions, medication brand names,  medication generic names,  pediatric dose checking, duplicate therapy, ePrescribing. etc, it would be worthwhile calling one of them for guidance.  Doing this sooner rather than later can save a lot of grief. 

Drug Databases with the right APIs Drive Down Costs

Wednesday, June 16, 2010 by David Wilkof
There is little doubt that hospitals will have to drive down  expenses as a percentage of their overall revenues.   Currently there is a big push to identify hospitals that are more cost efficient than  their rivals.    More  of these hospitals will be used benchmarks for cost of reimbursement and cost per procedure.

So what does that mean regarding costs,  particularly as it relates to drug information?   In part,  it means that your clinical decision support system providing  drug information  must drive utilization up  and  costs down.   There are so many decisions that are tied to drug information  that having the right information with the right APIs is key to managing costs and maximizing worker throughput.  Just to name a few:  medication lists,  drug lists,  dosage precautions,  dosing pediatric,  dose range,  dose calculator,  drug nomenclature,  and more. 

There are only a few providers of this level of drug  information and only one or two that provide the appropriate APIs that can tie into your system in a seamless fashion.     Certainly you are concerned about providing the right trail for Meaningful Use to maximize your reimbursement.  But the other side is to improve the productivity of your staff by having your people do more with less -- thus driving down costs.

Lexi-Comp has now become a key player in providing critical drug information for clinical decision support  --- priced right with low switching costs.


Integrated Drug Data

Wednesday, June 16, 2010 by Ryan Smith
The implementation of electronic health records (EHR) claims to help reduce medical errors by providing healthcare professionals with clinical decision support. Some of the existing EHR providers in the hospital setting have the software architecture that allows the hospital to choose the drug data knowledge base that the hospital prefers to use however, there are other EHR providers in the hospital setting that force the hospital to use the drug data knowledge source without any choice.  Drug data is a critical component that has an impact on healthcare costs and the overall quality of patient care, so having the ability to select which knowledge base should be a consideration of the EHR vendor.

I have had discussions with various hospitals that are not satisfied with their current EHR provider's drug knowledge base and have expressed an interested in evaluating other drug data resources such as Lexi-Data.

Lexi-Comp offers a product called Lexi-Data that contains decision support information such as drug interaction software (drug-drug and drug-food), drug allergy checking, therapeutic duplication checking, dose range checking (adult and pediatric) and more. Lexi-Data also contains drug reference book information, dose administrations, dosage precautions, dosing in pediatrics, and much more.  Delivery options include database tables that are compatible with Oracle, SQL Server, and MySQL and an easily implemented Software Development Kit (SDK) powered by Jav or .NET APIs.

Integrating drug data and drug interaction databases into EHRs for clinical decision support

Wednesday, June 9, 2010 by David Wilkof
Integrating drug data and drug interaction databases into EHR,  HIS,  EMR systems and the like is not an easy task.  One must feel comfortable that the data is accurate, the provider is easy to work with, and the price is right.  In the last year, the landscape of vendors has started changing, along with the demands for implementing systems establishing meaningful use.  For those hospitals and software providers in search of drug information for clinical decision making support, they must keep an open mind and look for a vendor that provides the best balance of accuracy, easy of working with, the right price.

The demands of interoperability and nomenclature coordination are indeed a great challenge.  The government is involved at some level setting up standards, but these standards are only the beginning.  The actual pragmatic application (a la John Dewey) occurs in the marketplace.  It is not simple and there are changes taking place daily. 

There is much to be concerned about, such as:  dosage administration, drug brand names, drug generic names, dosage precautions, medicine interaction, drug product information, duplicate therapy, ePrescribing, therapeutic dosage, meaningful use, and on and on. 

When all is said and done, pick a vendor carefully.  You might be together for a long time and stormy relationships don't make for good ones.

Integrating the good drug data into EHRs is no easy task

Thursday, June 3, 2010 by David Wilkof
More and more information and data are getting integrated into EHRs,  EMRs and the like.  On one hand,  the feeling is that a well-integrated clinical support system will increase efficiency,  reduce costs,  and improve safety.  On the other hand,  with so much data coming from a variety of sources,  it is difficult to ensure that the best and most useful information finds its way into the system.   The overall goal is to improve workflow.  

But with so many pieces and parts involved,  it is difficult to ensure top quality.  This is particularly difficult when it comes to drug data.  What kind of considerations emerge with respect to drug data in these clinical support systems?  Some of these considerations include:  drug mapping,   drug classifications, drug brand names, dosage precautions, medication brand names,  medicine interactions, pediatric dosing calculators,  drug nomenclature, ePrescribing,  therapeutic dosage,  meaningful use of EHRs,  and more.    Understanding the details of how these factors will impact the selection of a drug database vendor is important to the successful integration of this data into all clinical decision support systems.

Assisting EHR Vendors with Clinical Decision Support

Thursday, June 3, 2010 by David White
Lexi-Comp can assist EHR vendors in meeting several aspects of clinical decision support required for certification.  Content areas where Lexi-Comp can help include: reference content, medication lists, drug-related decision support, and support for prescription writing.

Referential content

  • Provides reference information for ordering / prescribing medications
  • Allows users to access and review medication information, including drug monographs and patient education material
  • Provides information on dosing adjustments for renal impairment 
  • Identifies age-based warning / Beers criteria medications
Medication lists
  • Each drug name and drug product are distinguished by unique identifiers / drug nomenclature which are mapped to other standard drug vocabularies in RxNorm
  • Allows searching for medications by generic name, brand name, or therapeutic class

Drug-related decision support
  • Provides content for screening medication orders for allergy and drug interactions
  • Facilitates drug interaction checking 
  • May be used to create medication dosing alerts including dosage range checking and dosage precautions

Support for prescription writing
  • Supports ePrescribing by providing data to define dosage form, route, frequency and strength
  • Provides a "starter set" of common orders to facilitate Eprescribing

Why are adverse drug events so common?

Thursday, May 27, 2010 by Ryan Smith
In 2009, the number of prescriptions dispensed in the U.S. increased 2.1% to 3.9 billion, IMS Health reported. Today’s pharmacist must take on more responsibilities, including prospective drug review on each prescription, the duty to warn of a physician’s error, the duty to counsel and monitor controlled substance prescriptions for abuse, and much much more. 

In all human activities, a certain number of errors are inevitable, but the public expects pharmacists, and the medical profession in general, to be perfect. Most errors cause little or no harm, but certain pharmacy errors can lead to very serious consequences. While visiting a retail pharmacy store, I observed the working conditions in the retail pharmacy and realized that they far exceeded my expectations related what I had anticipated the "standard" workload of a pharmacist to be. This highly demanding workload for pharmacists increases the potential for medication errors as the prescription volume is exceeding capacity which, as a patient, is concerning.

Having content that is continually updated that provides access to the most current information available is critical. Additionally, decision support information such as drug interaction software checking (drug-drug and drug-food), drug allergy checking, duplicate therapy checking, dosage range checking (adult and pediatric), and dosage precautions are necessary to help reduce adverse drug events.

More and more health websites providing drug information

Friday, May 7, 2010 by David Wilkof
As the number of websites focusing on health continues to skyrocket, we are seeing an increased number of sites providing a variety of drug information.  Some just provide medicine lists, some provide dosage ranges based on the type of medication (some specifically on pediatric dose calculations), and others include dosage precautions and medication interactions. 

As people's interest in health increases, so does their level of interest in the medications they are taking.  Additionally,  more and more people are taking control of their own health decisions and treatment action.  The internet has allowed them to do more investigation into their own situations.  Better understanding drug interactions and side effects is just one of those areas.  As a result,  an increasing number of websites are including Lexi-Comp drug data in their offerings to users.